Tootfinder

Opt-in global Mastodon full text search. Join the index!

No exact results. Similar results found.
@Techmeme@techhub.social
2024-02-29 06:50:39

Eight EU consumer rights groups lodge GDPR complaints with national data protection authorities, accusing Meta of coercing users with its "pay-or-consent" model (Natasha Lomas/TechCrunch)
techcrunch.com/2024/02/28/meta

@DrPlanktonguy@ecoevo.social
2024-05-04 15:27:52

I'm very familiar with the red-tape and hoop-jumping that is necessary to produce an official logo within #Cangov departments. I agree the strange and unexplained "Lego moose design" choice is truly odd, but it guaranteed had to go through numerous levels for approval.
It does irk me that the response to criticism is saying, "It was developed by DND's internal graphic …

image/jpeg
@arXiv_mathAT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-04-12 08:34:24

This arxiv.org/abs/2307.03417 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…

@Techmeme@techhub.social
2024-02-29 06:50:39

Eight EU consumer rights groups lodge GDPR complaints with national data protection authorities, accusing Meta of coercing users with its "pay-or-consent" model (Natasha Lomas/TechCrunch)
techcrunch.com/2024/02/28/meta

@arXiv_csDM_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-03-01 06:48:54

More algorithmic results for problems of spread of influence in edge-weighted graphs with and without incentives
Siavash Askari, Manouchehr Zaker
arxiv.org/abs/2402.19257

@arXiv_mathCO_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-04-23 07:13:50

Beyond the classification theorem of Cameron, Goethals, Seidel, and Shult
Hricha Acharya, Zilin Jiang
arxiv.org/abs/2404.13136

@dkomaran@social.linux.pizza
2024-02-18 19:22:38

youtu.be/7TFbzGxHFaI?si=-gXUrf
Don't agree with the low Weetabix score. However anything tastes better with brown sugar.

@arXiv_eessIV_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-05-01 06:53:56

Longitudinal Mammogram Risk Prediction
Batuhan K. Karaman, Katerina Dodelzon, Gozde B. Akar, Mert R. Sabuncu
arxiv.org/abs/2404.19083 arxiv.org/pdf/2404.19083
arXiv:2404.19083v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality among women worldwide. Early detection and risk assessment play a crucial role in improving survival rates. Therefore, annual or biennial mammograms are often recommended for screening in high-risk groups. Mammograms are typically interpreted by expert radiologists based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), which provides a uniform way to describe findings and categorizes them to indicate the level of concern for breast cancer. Recently, machine learning (ML) and computational approaches have been developed to automate and improve the interpretation of mammograms. However, both BI-RADS and the ML-based methods focus on the analysis of data from the present and sometimes the most recent prior visit. While it is clear that temporal changes in image features of the longitudinal scans should carry value for quantifying breast cancer risk, no prior work has conducted a systematic study of this. In this paper, we extend a state-of-the-art ML model to ingest an arbitrary number of longitudinal mammograms and predict future breast cancer risk. On a large-scale dataset, we demonstrate that our model, LoMaR, achieves state-of-the-art performance when presented with only the present mammogram. Furthermore, we use LoMaR to characterize the predictive value of prior visits. Our results show that longer histories (e.g., up to four prior annual mammograms) can significantly boost the accuracy of predicting future breast cancer risk, particularly beyond the short-term. Our code and model weights are available at github.com/batuhankmkaraman/Lo.

@arXiv_mathRT_bot@mastoxiv.page
2024-04-03 08:47:04

This arxiv.org/abs/2303.08267 has been replaced.
initial toot: mastoxiv.page/@arXiv_mat…

@dkomaran@social.linux.pizza
2024-02-18 19:22:38

youtu.be/7TFbzGxHFaI?si=-gXUrf
Don't agree with the low Weetabix score. However anything tastes better with brown sugar.